/photog

teaser image

“Your first 10,000 photographs are your worst.”
Working towards that number changes the way you see the world. Living in this crowded-crumbling, sexy-scary, crazy-noisy, feast-of-vision city surely helps a bit. Keep your eyes peeled and trigger-finger ready.

//More

/literati

teaser image

“When I was your age television was called books!” Peter Faulk neatly sums up the written word’s apparent fall from grace. Yes, the telly has of late been dating smarter girls. But there’s more than one way to peel a couch potato. Turn it off and turn the page.

//More

/sound + vision

teaser image

“A film is more like music than like fiction.”
Indeed, they are birds of a feather– a murder of crows pecking away at yoga, politics and walks in the park to carve out a life of blurred vision, tinitus and narrow cultural vocabulary. That’s the way, uh huh, I like it.

//More

/ the daily muse

Page 6 of 22 | prev | next

Weather Report: Shitty

Maunet Weather Report March 23iPhone 4G + CameraBag

After a couple of glorious spring teases this weekend, Brooklyn’s back to its typical “wintry mix” of snow, rain, wind and cold. There should be a simpler meteorological term for this kind of day: Shitty. Perfect for a long, gloomy record from the late 80′s as I spin Disintegration on repeat all day long. At least my wall’s not leaking any more.

Enjoy the misery, friends. It will soon be over…

“Same Deep Water as You” | The Cure

  1. Wednesday 03.23.2011 | 4:48 EDT

    spud says:

    great shot – you bastard

Coming Soonish: NYC At Your Feet

NYC At Your Feet Teaser

Well, I’ve been talking about it for almost 10 years, but it seems I’ve finally got my ass in gear.
And thus begins the early campaign for a decade’s worth of from-the-hip, below the waist photo treats going public in print and digital this spring. And by public I mean anyone who stumbles across maunet or happens to be friend or family enough for the book to bear out as gift or purchase. And by spring I mean probably early summer. You see, with the help of the good folks at blurb.com, this is a self-published affair. Voyeuristic, narcissistic – what’s the difference…

“Walk On The Wild Side” | Lou Reed

From the introduction:

The idea for this book began taking shape in October 1999 upon moving to New York City,
a town renowned equally for it’s eclectic style and harshness of character.

A place where, generally, we don’t make eye contact.

Sitting in a subway car, we follow protocol. Hunched against the winter wind,
our gaze drops to the ground beneath our feet. Our field of vision is self-limited
to that narrow frame between the pockmarked sidewalk and the waistlines of
our fellow New Yorkers. Through this lens we gather our first concrete observations,
draw initial conclusions about the kind of person passing by us might be.
Where they dine. Where they dance. Where they work and play.

Ok, so it needs some work. That’s what I’m doing. I’ve made enough contact prints to paper the wall of my apartment. Becca Black and Brady Spud have graciously helped me edit down from 500 shots to a mere 50 spreads celebrating the fashion foot. Building the layout’s a bitch. Sequencing it ain’t nothin’ like making a mix tape. Ok, something like it, but, um, harder. And there’s this whole InDesign thing, which quite unlike Photoshop, makes me feel small and stupid.

But it’s well on its way. Check back soon-ish.

NYC At Your Feet Layout

NYC At Your Feet Teaser

  1. Tuesday 03.22.2011 | 3:08 EDT

    hope says:

    congratulations! can’t wait to hold your book in my hands, so proud, xh

  2. Thursday 03.17.2011 | 4:20 EDT

    krebby says:

    Cool project! Can’t wait to see it.

  3. Thursday 03.17.2011 | 2:02 EDT

    KBJr says:

    Excellent and long-awaited news!!!!!!

  4. Thursday 03.17.2011 | 7:13 EDT

    zote63 says:

    pretty cool…my brother just made a blurb book on the national…

    1. Thursday 03.17.2011 | 11:10 EDT

      chairmanmau says:

      i’d love to see this, is there a digital version of it out there somewhere?

      1. Thursday 03.17.2011 | 4:26 EDT

        zote63 says:

        just let me find it…he did twenty pages with a hard cover…

  5. Thursday 03.17.2011 | 5:13 EDT

    melania says:

    this is So exciting! i can’t wait until i can get one for myself and some for gifts. it’s an excellent idea and the photos i’ve seen so far are stunning. will you intersperse the photo w/ stories, or leave it at a gorgeous visual book? also, will we be able to buy signed prints by you?

    1. Thursday 03.17.2011 | 11:06 EDT

      chairmanmau says:

      Thanks M – save for three chapter names, there will be no other text, save a douchy intro and some technical notes + thank yous. I’ll be selling the book online cost TBD. Prints will be sold as large as 13″x19″ archival quality color or black and white, cost TBD. Thanks for the support! Stay tuned, hope all is well! Let me knwo when you’re in NYC again, I keep missing you!

  6. Thursday 03.17.2011 | 1:18 EDT

    Sarah says:

    Freaking HATE indesign resorted to blurb.com for my books.. Book concept is intriguing..

    1. Thursday 03.17.2011 | 2:22 EDT

      chairmanmau says:

      Mos def, ID is a mean mistress. Did you do a sleeve cover or Image Wrap?

Weather Report: Torrents and Leaks


iPhone 4G + CameraBag

“Whiskey & Water” | Tindersticks

It’s 11:30PM and I’ve been dicking off upstairs all night, sipping whiskey, making prints and listening to fresh 180 gram vinyl. It’s an hours-long downpour outside, winds wipping grape-size raindrops hard against the window panes.

I head finally downstairs, presumably to bed, where I’ll pick back up on the early pages of The Brothers Karamazov, a daunting read I feel compelled to attempt for hope of some rich reward. I put out lights one by one before noticing a triad trickle of water snaking its way down the long loft wall. A lateral beam has cracked the drywall, an ironic misnomer as streaks of water inch steadily towards the floor. Seems the Brothers will have to wait.

Wiping the wall with a towel, I ponder how to patch the levee, lest it break. Duct tape. Duct tape fixes anything. But not even several layers of rugged silver adhesive stems the trickling tide. I haul out the iron WWII munitions case that houses sundry household hardware: wood saw and ratchet set; filament, twine, pliers and wire; hammers; wrenches; nails, fasteners, screws and bolts of infinite variety. Alas, no spackle, no blade. Where the hell is that? Ah, but here we go: caulk and caulking gun. Manly.

After a puzzled minute or two I manage to load the phallic plastic tube into its steel housing. Locked and loaded, I feel competent and self assured. Who needs a landlord when you’re so well equipped? I snip the tip and squeeze, expecting the orderly clean line of sealant to conform neatly to the long cracked line of wet flaking paint and drywall. Nothing. Squeeze as I might, I cannot coax a drop. Snip and squeeze again. Nothing. Seems the unused tube has lain fallow too long in that old munitions box, dried up solid as granite. Tindersticks sings “Whiskey & Water” as I defeatedly return the tools to their heavy metal home, resolved to the forces of nature, watching helplessly as the injured wall cracks, streaks and peels into the night.


iPhone 4G + CameraBag

  1. Monday 03.14.2011 | 6:01 EDT

    Rob says:

    1. Thursday 03.24.2011 | 12:58 EDT

      chairmanmau says:

      i assume you posted that Jayhawks video cause my girlfriend Mary Louise is in it, cause I fuckin’ hate the Jayhawks and you should too ;-)

  2. Monday 03.14.2011 | 5:51 EDT

    daniel says:

    funny how i thought this was going to be about bit-torrent and album leaks. you’re still manly in my book!

  3. Monday 03.14.2011 | 5:39 EDT

    Luke says:

    love that second photo. the streams down the wall are great.

Drifting Off at The King’s Speech

the_kings_speech_movie_poster

Prior to last night’s showing, in 30 years I’ve fallen asleep in a theater exactly two times:

1.1995, GoldenEye, because Pierce Brosnan is a bloody boring 007. Hey Brosnan, the 80′s called.
It wants Timothy Dalton Back
2. 1998, Elizabeth, with mom, who loves period pieces. Love me some Cate Blachet, but sorry, the walls were breathin’ after 48 consecutive hours without sleep.

Now, The King’s English. Why the bloody hell is everybody standing at attention for this movie? I’ve seen neither a negative nod nor an ironic wink from those in the cinema Circle of Trust (or outside of it for that matter). I don’t get it. So there’s a few moments of droll British humor. Who doesn’t like that. And the camera work is interesting (if not a bit overwroght, like Tom Ford’s A Single Man). And sure, the acting is superb. Duh.

But it’s soooo boring! Now, I’m a fan of the deliberately paced film (McCabe & Ms. Miller, The Assassination of Jesse James, , Marie Antoinette, Paris Texas). But this film is billed as “Makes your spirit soar?” and “Crowd Pleaser?” Puh-puh-puh-please, but this puh-puh-puh-plodding story left me neither soaring nor pleased. Just sleepy. Woulda made a great short film. There, I said it.

Bugger off , Your Majesty. Hope Black Swan pecks your eyes out.

Black_Swan_Poster

  1. Tuesday 02.22.2011 | 11:03 EDT

    Rockpants says:

    And Mau, uh, in case you fell asleep for this one, let me assure you that Black Swan totally sucked! I can’t keep to protocol here. That was the worst ever.

    1. Tuesday 02.22.2011 | 10:58 EDT

      chairmanmau says:

      sorry deeka, saw it twice at the theater in one week. i LOVED it. can’t believe you didn’t like it. actually, i totally can.

  2. Tuesday 02.22.2011 | 10:03 EDT

    Luke Hughett says:

    When I got to the end of this review, I read what I thought was the first response to your review. “Be nice,” it began. And then I realized that was your commenting protocol. Perhaps that should be the review protocol as well, hm? ; )

    Fair enough if you fell asleep. It’s not exactly a Michael Bay action film. (btw, I loved reading about the films that put you to sleep in the theater. I’m fond of saying that I didn’t FALL asleep at Tim Burton’s “Planet of the Apes”; I WENT to sleep. It was a conscious decision.)

    But is that it? “This movie was boring. It put me to sleep.” The end. Be constructive! What would you have done differently? What would have made it more interesting?

    1. Tuesday 02.22.2011 | 10:59 EDT

      chairmanmau says:

      well Luke, if you read further in the protocol, it also reads “Vigorous debate, strongly opinionated dialogue and mild expletives are tolerated, if not encouraged. ”
      So thanks for being one of the first to post a comment that challenges the prevailing (i.e. my) opinion.
      So you’d like some supporting arguments as to why this film was a complete snoozer? Here we go:
      1. Expectations: true, hype and positive reviews can influence the viewer’s ultimate reaction to a film. Based on professional and colleague reviews, I was prepared for something really special. My expectations did not meet the reality. Maybe that’s a personal reaction, but hey – this is my party and i can cry if i want to ;)
      2. Narrative: There simply wasn’t enough story here to support a 1:50 film. Yes, the relationship between the King and his teacher was interesting, challenging, tender, etc… (Jeffrey Rush was in fact fantastic, probably the best part of the film) but his role is not enough to carry the film.
      The story presents only one conflict (man vs himself). The challenges and consternation the King faced in overcoming his speech impediment and fear of public speaking were presented realistically, sympathetically – yet there was no other real conflict to make the film dig out of the morass of the King’s own stutter. The wife was supportive to the point of saccharine, his colleagues the same. There was really nothing in his way except his own impediment. Hardly makes for high drama, especially in high court, where one would expect some. Yes, there was the looming conflict with Germany, but that historical fact is so deeply ingrained in the public mind that its presence is diluted and feels like an aside, a matter of consequence that any person of power would have to contend with. Suck it up, man, you’re a King for chrissakes.
      3. Art Direction as distraction: the film looked beautiful, with all its fancy haze, short depth of field and pastel palette. But did this AD contribute anything to represent the character’s inner or outer struggle? Maybe I was asleep on this one, but it seems not
      Take a film like Oh Brother Where Art Thou? or Requiem for a Dream. Regardless of how you feel about the merits of either of these two films, the Art Direction contributed directly to the film’s themes. Color, sound and camera actually become characters themselves. In the case of RFAD, a frenetic camera, green and blues hues and hyper-real sound effects spoke to the sickly, degenerate spiral of the films drug-addled fallen angels. In the case of OBWAT, the consistent use of saturated yellows and browns presented a silent character whose job it was to communicate a sense of place, time and psychological state (yellow being a color given to associations of enlightenment). The typically excellent camera work by Roger Deakins uses wide shots to communicate the expansiveness of the hero’s quest and close shots to highlight the charm and connivery of the protagonists’ personalities. The soundtrack speaks for itself, so don’t even start!
      The AD for The King’s Speech does none of these things. The camera work, like the plot, lacked movement and energy. Sound editing was nothing special, save for the clean representation of the King’s st-st-ststammer. The simply wasn’t much on the technical side that enhanced the film or elevated it to anything more than a good episode of Masterpiece Theater.
      As I said earlier, the acting is of course unassailable. But we’ve seen time and time again that great acting alone cannot save a flawed script or lack of narrative arc.
      So, Sir Luke, with all the due respect to those that loved this ,movie, I’m truly glad you did. I still think Black Swan actually presented something special and alive and deserves the higher recognition.
      cheers
      mau

      1. Tuesday 02.22.2011 | 11:39 EDT

        Luke says:

        That’s the Mauricio I remember! Well done.

        For the record, i wasn’t blown away by the film. I did think the acting was superb, but you’re right: that’s not enough to carry it to the heights. And you’re also right that it was too long.

        However, I wasn’t bothered by the marginalization of World War II’s escalation and I thought the art direction was appropriate given the script’s subject matter and nonfiction category. It felt real. The colors were dull and aged in places; in others they were regal and spectacular. But it felt like a very real period piece.

        I loved Requiem for a Dream (it still haunts me) but it was waaaay over the top; stylized to the point that one wonders if the story would have stood on its own without all the eye candy and musical button-pushing.

        I didn’t care much for O Brother Where Art Thou, but i get what you’re saying: the art direction took the viewer to the Coen brothers’ imagined historical-slash-fantastical place. The King’s Speech could have benefitted from some of this but I wonder if it would have been out of place given the subject matter.

        If The King’s Speech were shorter and more concise could it garner the Best Picture nod? Based solely on the voyeuristic look at England’s class structure being folded over itself to strengthen the royalty in a time of great national need? I don’t know what the official definition of “Short” is to the Academy.

Weather Report:
Spring Seagulls Tease Brooklyn

Ben Curtis Seagulls
© Ben Curtis 2011 iPhone 4G + Hipstamatic
On the most temperate day we’ve had months, all manner of species where drawn out by a cruel tease of Spring. One result is these stunning photographs by buddy Ben Curtis, taken on a balmy 67º Brooklyn winter day. That ain’t gonna last for long…
But look at ‘em. It proves again iPhone + on-board processing apps is the Polaroid
of our generation.

“Wishing: (If I Had a Photograph Of You)” | Flock of Seagulls

And speaking of how kick ass the iPhone is (not), it can’t listen to any of the audio on this site. Lame.

ben-curtis-seagulls
© Ben Curtis 2011 iPhone 4G + Hipstamatic
  1. Monday 02.21.2011 | 11:13 EDT

    yula says:

    Ben, your photos are incredible. Love the subject matter ;) thanks for sharing, Mauri

Looking for Snodgrass

W.D. Snodgrass

An unnervingly familiar recount of a wandering mind that looks but cannot find:

Looking
by W.D. Snodgrass

What was I looking for today?
All that poking under the rugs,
Peering under the lamps and chairs,
Or going from room to room that way,
Forever up and down the stairs
Like someone stupid with sleep or drugs.

Everywhere I was, was wrong.
I started turning the drawers out, then
I was staring in at the icebox door
Wondering if I’d been there long
Wondering what I was looking for.
Later on, I think I went back again.

Where did the rest of the time go?
Was I down cellar? I can’t recall
Finding the light switch, or the last
Place I’ve had it, or how I’d know
I didn’t look at it and go past.
Or whether it’s what I want, at all.

Grief has a way of stealing your memory. In response:

Looking
by M.C

Looking
I saw the calendar has passed three weeks, like wind
I’ve been flying better, better still
better living still through chemistry

I see my books are off the racks again, birds uncaged
Swooping back I peck at Snodgrass’ verse on memory

I see how close it all still is, like thugs
Mugging bright thoughts down dark alleys
I see how veiled it all remains, like smoke
Suffocating vivid thoughts to whispers

Looking
I saw how lost I still may be
In this addled high fake energy

Jack + Ginger: A Sourmash Valentine

Jack + Ginger: A Sourmash Valentine

three hundred women in three hours
told me, boy forget the flowers

–Violent Femmes, Dating Days

You know what today is? It’s the 10th anniversary of what might be the finest compilation by maunet ever. Oh yeah, it’s Valentine’s Day too. So in honor of both, the royal we is spinning a record ripe with funny, angry, bitter-teary, drinking blues songs that’ll leave you seeing red.

Yes, it’s a self-pitying, maudlin, adolescent collection of tracks–that’s what love lost does to the best of us, no? But you can’t knock late 60′s Rod Stewart drinkin’ and raspin’ with the Jeff Beck Group. Or the R&B awesomeness of Leslie Miller, courtesy of the Midnight Cowboy soundtrack. Love’s performance of Burt Bacharach’s “My Little Red Book” sounds not like a Charlie Manson-era hippie trip but more like the conception of the Cure’s Boys Don’t Cry. That 1920′s Bessie Smith song? Woo papa, Rap ain’t got nothin’ on her dirty lyrics. And who else follows Chet Baker with the Soft Boys? C’mon, you’re gonna love it.

For you fools in love, really: Happy Valentine’s Day. You need this record, if only to remind you just how brown the grass can be on the other side.

For the rest of you sad single bastards, press play, mix equal parts bitterness and heartbreak with one shot straight Kentuky bourbon, consume and repeat.

cheers!

Jack + GInger: A Sourmash Valentine
photography + cover art © maunet.com
  1. Monday 02.14.2011 | 10:37 EDT

    Boonerang says:

    A tasty mix is a thing of beauty-Great images and great songs! (Big ups for a Kelly Hogan song.)

Page 6 of 22 | prev | next